Talk:Blogs and RTI Act of India

From Censorship Wikia, the free censorship database

Jump to: navigation, search

On the Google Group one of the lawyers recommended against using the RTI Act due to the long wait. There were other suggestions, however, of how to proceed. Here is the post from Recluse on the Google Group:

I volunteer my services as a lawyer and a blogger [1] and I just wanted to touch upon something briefly:

I have checked the pages of NDTV, Indian Express, Indiatimes, CNN-IBN, The Hindu, Times Now and the Hindustan Times and have found no news on the ban at all [At 2 a.m on July 18]. Only rediff carries a story at http://in.rediff.com/news/2006/jul/17blog.htm


In the rediff story, it suggests that a Right to Information application will be made by the Bloggers Collective. I strongly discourage this, because the RTI Act allows the Government a period of 30 days to respond to your application.


The relevant part of Section 7 of the Act is as follows: "....the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, on receipt of a request undersection 6 shall, as expeditiously as possible, and in any case within thirty days of the receipt of the request, either provide the information on payment of such fee as may be prescribed or reject the request for any of the reasons specified in sections 8 and 9."


THIRTY DAYS is way too long for bloggers to wait for the ban to be lifted. If we do get a copy of the Government directive/order to the ISPs, then this would be the basis for us to file a Writ Petition in any High Court or even the Supreme Court. This is a much better option. Any suggestions?

[edit] Not a reply to the previous comment..

..just a word of appreciation to all who worked on this clear, easy-to-understand set of instructions. peter

Personal tools
.